PART 2 Esau Have I
Hated! In part 1 of this study, we discussed some of the history
between Jacob and Esau, the twin sons of Isaac.
The Bible describes them as being very different from one another, even
before they were born! Jacob, as we
know, was the son of choice with respect to Yahweh’s plan of salvation. This divinely chosen line, although it can
certainly be traced back all the way to Seth and Adam, really commenced in a
spiritual manner with Abraham, the one with whom the most significant covenant
was made, and to whom the greatest promises were granted. Esau, though first-born, proved to be a lesser man than
his brother Jacob, selling his birthright for a bowl of red pottage when he was
overcome with hunger, and with it the promises made to Abraham. He then proceeded to lose the blessing of his
father Isaac, a blessing which was honored by the Almighty, when his younger
brother stole it from him through cunning and collusion with their mother. In fact,
Jacob’s desire to obtain on his own what God wanted to give him set the
tone for much of his early life. Clearly
the man who would become the father of From the very beginning, Jacob and Esau had
problems. They were so totally different
in their natures, as well as in their dedication to God and their parents. Once of age, Esau defied the wishes of all
concerned by taking unto himself two wives of the Canaanites, the most
despicable people on the face of the earth, a people so evil and so detrimental
to the plan of salvation that Yahweh had already determined they would have to
eventually be exterminated from the face of the earth! These descendants of The nephilim or
fallen ones, as the Hebrew conveys,
were imbued with supernatural powers and abilities. They were inherently evil and submitted
themselves to their even more evil forebears, wreaking havoc upon the
earth. Through them the pre-Flood was
utterly twisted, as they introduced every form and facet of distorted, abnormal,
deviant behavior of the most egregious kind, going far beyond what mere human
beings could have ever even imagined was possible. Eventually, mankind was so totally warped and
corrupt, God had no choice but to do the unthinkable–utterly destroy every man,
woman, and child on the earth! It is
unquestionably the most unprecedented event in all of human history. Esau’s marriage into the line of the fallen It is perhaps difficult to appreciate the gravity of
Esau’s sinful nature, for it was not one simply of human carnality, something
with which we all are born, but a rejection of the true God Yahweh, a rejection
of His plan of salvation, a rejection of the birthright, which would have
included the righteous line from whence the Messiah would be born, and an
embracing of the enemies of God and their nefarious plans for perverting and
thus thwarting the divine objective in creating the human race in the first
place! In this respect, Esau tracks back
to Nimrod and Cain, God-hating, God-rejecting despots willing to sell their
souls to gain control of the world! He
made his decisions, he lived by his decisions, and he died by his
decisions. It is even stated in the
Bible that Esau sought repentance, but he could not find it. In other words, he regretted the result of
his heinous sins, in that he and his people were shut out from God and disenfranchised,
but he could not bring himself to turn toward the Almighty and genuinely
change. And thus it is said of this man
in the Scriptures: “Wherefore lift up the hands which hang down, and the feeble
knees...Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see
the Lord: looking diligently, lest any man fall from the grace of God; lest any
root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; lest
there be any FORNICATOR, or PROFANE PERSON, as ESAU, who
for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.
For you know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the
blessing, he was rejected: for he found NO PLACE OF REPENTANCE (Gk. no way to change his mind), though he
sought it carefully with tears” (Heb. 12:12-17). From God’s perspective, Esau was considered a fornicator. What does this mean? First of all, it pertains to the fact that he
married into the line of |
Why do you suppose that Esau chose to marry the daughters
of Heth? The true perverse nature of
Esau is actually exposed in the commission of this act, although it might not
appear so on the surface. To explain this
fact, think back to the time when Esau sold his birthright to Jacob in what has
to be considered one of the most incredible decisions anyone has ever
made! Do you recall Esau’s uttering even
the slightest lament over doing something so sinful and so stupid? No, you do not, because he, caught up as he
was with himself and his insatiable appetite, thoughtlessly, carelessly, and
carnally despised his birthright and literally gave it away for a mere
pittance. Here’s what Esau actually said
on that signal occasion: “And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and WHAT PROFIT
SHALL THIS BIRTHRIGHT DO TO ME? And
Jacob said, Swear to me this day; and he sware unto him: and he sold his
birthright unto Jacob. Then Jacob gave
Esau bread and pottage of lentils; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and
went his way: thus ESAU DESPISED HIS BIRTHRIGHT” (Gen. 25:32-34). Esau was driven by his
carnal appetites rather than by the Spirit of God. All he was interested in doing was filling
his stomach with Jacob’s red pottage. He
preferred being satiated with physical food than inheriting eternal life and
sonship with the Almighty. He treated
the sacred birthright as though it were a worthless, meaningless thing. He was not concerned in the least at the gravity
of his decision. The Bible says that he
just ate, and drank, and rose up, and casually went his way. The birthright he rejected
contained the divine promise of the great Messiah–a spiritual blessing about
which the earthy Esau cared nothing. On the
other hand, however, he sang quite a different tune when his brother Jacob
tricked him out of the blessing of the firstborn. Oh, how he cried, indeed sobbed in abject
sorrow, over the loss of this special blessing.
Why make such a to-do over losing this privilege, as opposed to having
no reaction in giving away the birthright?
The answer is in perfect alignment with the true nature of Esau. You see, the birthright was primarily spiritual in its intent, but the
blessing of the firstborn–now that was something else–that was great physical blessings, monetary increase,
and oh how Esau lamented the loss of such a prize. He cried out to Isaac, saying, surely you
must have a blessing for me too! What, you might ask, does this have to do with Esau’s
marriage to the daughters of Heth? Just
this–Heth was the father of the Hittites, and the Hittites were one of the most
powerful of all the ancient societies.
Renowned for their warring nature, the extent of their empire was at
times enormous, ranging all the way from Egypt, through northern Mesopotamia,
and into what is today Turkey. Their
rise to power coincided almost precisely with the intermarriage into their line
of Esau and his descendants, and they maintained this rule, despite various ups
and downs, for nearly a thousand years! Far less known than their infamous military prowess, the
Hittites were the richest of all the Middle Eastern tribes, not only in terms
of what they owned, but even more significantly in what they controlled. To put it in modern lingo, they were the
powerful bankers of that historical era.
They were the ancient world’s version of power brokers. They
regulated the flow of goods, services, and virtually all forms of monetary
exchange. When Esau realized that he had
lost the blessing of the firstborn, he immediately turned to the next best
source of money and power he could find–the family of Heth–the infamous
Hittites. With respect to Yahweh, a more
critical mistake he could not possibly have made. This association between the lines of Esau and Heth set
the stage for the future direction of the Edomites in history. They would eventually become, under the
influence of the Hittites, master creators, controllers, and manipulators of
monetary wealth. This held true in
ancient times, and it holds true in today’s 21st century world. They learned well the evil Hittite tactics of
deception and secrecy. They mastered the
art of control–whoever proved difficult was first warned, then threatened, then
defamed, then arrested on false charges, often wrongly imprisoned, and if those
attempts did not produce the desired results, they were summarily executed in
cold blood. The ruthless willingness to
murder one’s enemies or anyone who disagrees with or who refuses to submit to
one’s authority, is the most powerful force for control in human society. It is why such institutions as the Vatican,
the Mafia in its various forms, and the great banking cartels of the world, or
any number of dictators from Cain and Nimrod to Genghis Khan, Adolph Hitler,
Joseph Stalin, and Pol Pot, to individual political powers like Lyndon Johnson
and Bill Clinton, have been successful throughout history in maintaining their
power, whether corporate, political, religious, or personal in nature. Esau’s nickname was In part 1, we traced some of the early history of the
Edomites, in particular their association with out upon the whole land. In addition, we looked into the significance of Esau’s
two marriages to the daughters of Heth, the son of In part 1, we also discussed Abraham, his background in With respect to Abraham, we read the testimony of early
historians such as Berosus and Flavius Josephus, both of whom testified that
Abraham taught mathematics and astronomy to the Egyptians. We looked into the enigmatic account of
Genesis 14, a pivotal period in the history of the entire Transjordan area, not
to mention the demise of southern |
Finally, we delved into the possibility that the great
patriarch Job, about which so little seems to be known, might well have been a
descendant of Esau. While this
contention may go against current conventional thinking, it certainly was the
dominant understanding of the Jews at the time the Septuagint translation of
the Hebrew Scriptures was accomplished around 250 B.C., and for some time
thereafter as well. Job, in fact, may
actually be listed among the kings of second monarch was named Jobab, which means Father Job! The evil spirit of Esau continued to exist in his
descendants long after his demise. Esau
epitomizes the ultimate enemy of Yahweh and of the Messiah. He despised his birthright, part of which was
the chosen line through which the Savior of the world would be born. In doing so, Esau established forever the
attitude of the Edomites with respect to God and His purposes. That anti-Christ spirit can be easily seen in
the life of a rather obscure Biblical character named Doeg the Edomite. This wretched man lived during the days when David was
fleeing from king Saul. Doeg was but a
common soldier in the army of Upon the arrival of the army, the king called out the
high priest Ahimelech and demanded to know where David was hiding. The high priest refused to divulge anything
about David, and Saul, in a fit of utter rage, commanded his footmen to slay
all the priests of the Lord, an unprecedented request from a king of What does this story recorded in II Samuel 22 tell us
with regard to In this second installment of our study, we will continue
the pursuit of Esau’s many descendants as they migrated into areas far away
from their ancient homeland, and how their influence and impact has changed the
course of history, even to this very day.
We will hopefully come to see that the struggle which originally
transpired between Esau and Jacob in the womb of their mother Rebekah, not only
continues to this day, but will profoundly affect the future of this world
until the return of Messiah and the end of the age! Once the weakened Amalekite
hordes had finally been expelled from Yahweh began to warn the Jews that they were going to
bring upon themselves the kind of severe punishment the northern kingdom of In 612 B.C., Babylonian forces led by Crown Prince
Nebuchadnezzar, proceeded up the Once Nebuchadnezzar became king, he proved to be an adept
ruler and superb field general. His
armies either conquered or simply annexed much of the old Assyrian possessions. It wasn’t long before he turned his eye
toward the homeland of the Jews. Over a
period of some 18 years, the Babylonians launched three military campaigns
against the In October of 539 B.C., a combined force of Persians and
Medes under the direction of Darius diverted the course of the This particular night was the darkest in Babylonian
history, for at the very moment the Persians were silently invading the city,
the local regent, Belshazzar, was in the midst of a drunken orgy. It was on this occasion that he witnessed the
famous handwriting on the wall,
recorded in the book of Daniel, spelling the doom of Babylon(and fulfilling the
prediction of Jer. 25:12), and prophesying a 2,520 year period of demise upon
this kingdom, after which time it would once again rise and emerge great on the
world scene. This emergence at the time
of the end is discussed in the book of Revelation. The Persians subsequently took the city of |
The Babylonian captivity of “By the rivers of Many Edomites already lived in Babylonian territory, and
many others either moved there at or just after the Jewish captivity, or, in
some instances, were captured along with the Jews. Thus Edomite influence among the Jewish
people not only continued during their stay in It was this same Cyrus of whom Isaiah had prophesied over
100 years earlier that he would deliver the Jewish exiles and bring them back
into their own land (Isa. 27-28). This
he did, issuing a decree in 538 B.C., duly recorded in Hebrew in Ezra 1:2-4,
and in Aramaic in Ezra 6:3-5. The initial
contingent of Jews under the governorship of Zerubbabel removed from Trouble came quickly, however, in the form of Samaritans,
the people whom the king of Assyria had over 200 years earlier transplanted
into the northern realm of The next great influx of Jews into Judea occurred some 60
years later after the decree of Artaxerxes Longimanus was made in 457 B.C.
(Ezra 7). This particular order by the
Persian monarch was the fulfillment of a specific prophecy recorded in Daniel
9:25, whereupon Ezra the scribe was commissioned to lead the Jewish exiles back
to their homeland and beginning the process of rebuilding the city of
Jerusalem. Ezra was followed by a
Nehemiah-led group of exiles in 445 B.C. In between the first two post-exhilic returns to ESAU VS. JACOB THE PATTERN CONTINUES Although the story itself is quite well-known by most
Bible students, surprisingly few seem to realize that the antagonist of the
book of Esther is not Jewish, although this is certainly a story about Jews,
nor is he Persian, in spite of the fact that “After these things did king Ahasuerus (Xerxes I, king of Persia -
485-465 B.C., son of Darius the Great) promote Haman the son of Hammedatha the AGAGITE,
and advanced him, and set his seat above all the princes that were with him” (Esther
3:1). Haman, we are told, was an Agagite, but what, pray tell, is an Agagite?
The name sounds more like some sort of rock, such as anthracite, calcite, or aragonite. The real answer, however, is given in I
Samuel 15, and it probably shouldn’t surprise us all that much, for we read: “Thus says the Lord of hosts, I remember that which AMALEK did
to Note the name Agag in verse 8. It is from this word that we derive the term Agagite.
Agag was the most infamous of
the Amalekite kings, and remember that Amalek
was a son of Eliphaz, and thus a grandson of Esau. Therefore, we can confidently conclude that
Haman in the book of Ruth was a descendant of Esau–he was, in fact, an
Amalekite, and in a more general way, an Edomite. Knowing this information, it cannot be too shocking that
Haman would oppose the Jews who were in |
The descendants of Esau, as we can see in the person of
Haman, continued to despise the children of Jacob, and cause them as much
trouble as possible. In this instance,
Haman was resolute in his determination to completely annihilate the Jews in The story of Haman and the Jews in The reason behind such a conclusion is not only the fact
that Haman was a descendant of Agag, king of the Amalekites, and thus of the
line of Esau, but also the significance of Mordecai’s lineage as well. In Esther 2:5, we read: “Now in Shushan the palace there was a certain Jew, whose name was
Mordecai, the son of Jair, the son of Shimei, the son of KISH, a
BENJAMITE.” Who was this “Now there was a man of Benjamin, whose name was KISH, the son
of Abiel, the son of Zeror, the son of Bechorath, the son of Aphiah, a BENJAMITE,
a mighty man of power. And he had a son,
whose name was SAUL, a choice young man, and goodly: and there was not
among the children of Israel a goodlier person than he...Now the Lord had told
Samuel in his ear a day before Saul came, saying, Tomorrow about this time I
will send you a man out of the land of Benjamin, and you shall anoint him to be
captain over My people Israel, that he may save My people out of the hand of
the Philistines: for I have looked upon My people, because their cry is come
unto Me. And when Samuel saw Saul, the
Lord said unto him, Behold the man whom I spoke to you of! This same shall reign over My people” (I Sam.
9:1-2, 15-17). Remember, as we read earlier in I Samuel 15, that king
Saul was ordered by God to completely destroy the Amalekites, man, woman, child, and
animal. No trace of them was to remain
alive. This was a divine decree given by
Yahweh to not only punish Amalek for their cruel opposition to Israel, but also
to protect the Israelites from any future hardship that would surely result if
these people were spared. Don’t forget
that Amalek, the Amalekites, and king Agag, were all descendants of Esau, and
thus Edomites, the perpetual enemy of Saul, of course, did as God commanded, and went into
battle. He achieved a great victory, the
first over the Amalekites in many, many years.
It was a signal event, but it was marred by Saul’s unwillingness to obey
the instructions of Yahweh fully.
Instead of slaying all living aspects of the Amalekite culture, he
selfishly held back and spared some, including the king, Agag himself. The result was that the Amalekites were not
utterly destroyed, and thus a descendant of Amalek rises up some 600+ years
later in the days of Esther and Mordecai as the sworn opponent of the Jews in My good friend, Joe Good, founder of Hatikva Ministries,
has written a short book that is rich in revelation with regard to the book and
story of Esther. He notes the following
information that is most insightful, and which I think you will appreciate: “Once again there is a battle between Saul and Agag. Instead of Saul, son of “Indeed, in an even greater eschatological sense, Saul is a picture of
Adam, the first man and ruler in the Garden of Eden. Yet Adam, and Saul, fell to sin. In this same light, Mordecai is a picture of
the Messiah, the second Adam, who will succeed in overcoming all evil. Agag is a picture of Satan, and his descendant,
Haman, is a picture of the False Messiah” (Prophecies
in the Book of Esther, pp. 19-20). In other words, the conflict between Esau and Jacob,
starting before they were even born, and continuing on throughout history, is
the story of the Messiah and his arch- enemy, the False
Messiah. Indeed, as Joe Good goes on to
state: “In fact, the Midrash (Shocher Tov 9.10) states that God
proclaims that neither His name nor His throne can be complete until the seed
of Amalek is wiped from the face of the earth” (Ibid., p. 21). In the story presented in
the book of Esther, we have one of the ancient types of the end-time conflict
that will culminate in the return of the Messiah and His glorious triumph over
the enemies of With regard to Agag and Amalek, there is a very
interesting section of the Bible, where we read about the heathen seer Balaam,
adept at divination and highly esteemed throughout ancient Mesopotamia, who was
hired by Balak, king of Moab, to prophesy against Israel, because of their
stunning victory over Sihon, king of the Amorites and Og, king of Bashan, both
of whom were giants of the Rephaim
class and fierce warriors. As it turned
out, instead of prophesying against |
“How goodly are your tents, O Jacob, and your tabernacles, O Let’s notice a couple of
points in this passage. First of all,
don’t lose sight of the fact that what Balaam was given to predict with regard
to Who is this great king of In addition, Balaam speaks of the Amalekites with respect
to Do not, therefore, make the mistake that the Edomites are
only a relic of ancient history. Indeed,
if Back to the story in the book of Esther. You will recall that after Haman was elevated
in rank by king Xerxes, he demanded that everyone bow down to him (Esther
3:2-4), which indeed they did, but that Mordecai adamantly refused to do
so. This is quite reminiscent of what
the Babylonian monarch Nebuchadnezzar did, as recorded in the book of Daniel,
except that he had a great image built in the plain of Shinar. When we think of this image, we cannot help
but associate it with the infamous image
of the beast that is discussed in Revelation 13. This episode is to transpire at the time of
the end, and all people, the Bible states, will be required to bow down to this
image, or forfeit their very lives! In
fact, Nebuchadnezzar is a specific ancient type of the end-time evil ruler that
is referred to as the beast (this
term also applies to the political/military combine under his control as well),
and the image he constructed is directly typical of the aforementioned image of the beast. In the instance recorded in Daniel, the three young
Jewish captives, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, better known by their
Babylonian names, Shadrach, Meshech, and Abed-nego, openly defied
Nebuchadnezzar’s royal edict and refused to bow down to the golden image. For their withstanding of evil these men,
without any trial whatsoever, received the death penalty, and were summarily
cast into the fiery furnace. In like
manner, Mordecai, also a Jew, resisted Haman when he was commanded to do
obeisance unto him, and this Amalekite madman flew into a rage and conspired to
murder Mordecai and destroy all of the Jews in the kingdom as well. Again, according to Joe Good’s research, Haman
supposedly wore an image of a pagan idol attached to the belt around his
waist. And in the latter days, when the
command is given to worship the beast and his image, refusal to do so
will be considered a capital crime, indeed a crime against the state, a crime
against humanity, and will be punishable by excruciating death. The end-time circumstances that come upon
this earth will call for many Shadrachs, Meshachs, and Abed-negos, many
Mordecais, and indeed, many Esthers as well, men and women of true faith and
obedience who will be girded about with the spiritual armor of God, and who
will withstand to the face the evil decrees of the power elite of this
world! This time is coming, my friends. In fact, it is almost here. Day-by-day, it encroaches upon us. Step-by-step, the nefarious plot
systematically unfolds. The day of
reckoning is rapidly approaching. This
is not hype–it is REALITY!! The book of Esther continues
on with this amazing story of faith, courage, and determination in the face of
absolute evil and seemingly overwhelming odds.
It is quite interesting that most of the signal events transpire around
the Passover season. In fact, very
specific dates are mentioned, such as the 13th, 14th, and
16th days of Nisan, the first month of the sacred year. The fast which Esther eventually proclaimed
for the endangered Jews actually occurred over Passover itself, and her
appearance before the king transpired on the 16th day of the first
month, a very significant time in the annual calendar, for this is the precise
day on which the Israelites offered the wave
sheaf, and commenced their count to Pentecost (later, the Sadducees, a
small and corrupt Jewish sect, introduced the notion of a different reckoning
of Pentecost, but they were never successful in implementing it among the
Jews). In addition, Haman’s conspiracy against Mordecai and the
Jews backfired, and the gallows he had built upon which to hang Mordecai became
his own means of execution. This evil
Edomite died on the 17th day of Nisan, and once again we see how
significant the timing of all the events in the story of Esther really is. What is significant about the 17th
day of the first month? For starters, it
is the exact date on which the ark came to rest atop the mountains of Ararat. This is not some mere happenstance or
coincidence. This was divinely ordered,
for the ark pertains directly to the
Messiah Himself, the importance of which will be mentioned momentarily. Many scholars and students of the Bible believe the best
evidence demonstrates that ancient |
In like manner, the great restoration under King Hezekiah
was concluded on the 16th of Nisan, and we read in II Chronicles 29
the following: “Then Hezekiah the king rose early (on the 17th of Nisan),
and gathered the rulers of the city, and went up to the house of the Lord...So
the service of the house of the Lord was set in order. And Hezekiah rejoiced, and all the people,
that God had prepared the people: for the thing was done suddenly” (II Chron. 29:20,
35-36). So the 17th day
of the first month once again becomes the time when God’s people are
renewed. Hezekiah was the most righteous
king of the Jews since his ancestor David had sat on the throne in And, of course, this brings us to the most important 17th
day of the first month ever in the history of the human race–the day on which
Yahshua/Jesus the Messiah rose from the dead!
He was slain on the afternoon of the 14th day, precisely when
the Passover lambs were being sacrificed according to the command of Exodus 12,
buried late that afternoon, and spent 3 days and 3 nights (15th, 16th,
17th), arising from the dead late on the 17th day. And we are also told in Matthew 27:52-53 that
many also arose from their graves after His resurrection, and appeared in the
city of The significance of this day in history is so easily
overlooked or simply unknown, but Scripture indeed reveals that the 17th
day of the first month is the anniversary of a number of closely related, very
important events in the past. And it may
well have a great future application as well. Sometimes in reading this well known story, Esther’s part
in the great drama may get a bit overshadowed by Mordecai’s performance. This, however, should not be. Although Mordecai does stand as a type of the
Messiah, returning in power and victory at the end of this age, Esther has a
very significant role in this unfolding saga.
Though a mere unknown Jewish captive, incredibly she becomes queen of
the Esther’s given name is Hadassah, which means myrtle. The myrtle tree proves to be of significance
in the Scriptures. In fact, it could be
said to represent Like Esther, the myrtle tree is not nearly as impressive
or showy as other plants. It is not
lifted up like the cedars of Lebanon, nor does it possess the strength of the
oak. Rather it grows in low places, but
because of this fact, it receives extra moisture, keeping it very green and
strong. In fact, it withstands drought
and remains green even after being cut, indicative of the resilience of Esther,
Mordecai, and the Jews in the face of being taken captive to an alien land, and
living in harm’s way for many years. In
that sense, we could easily say that they were indeed cut down and removed from their native soil, yet remained
green. When the leaves of the myrtle
tree are crushed (symbolic of great trial and suffering), they produce a
fragrant perfume more potent than the rose, even as did the life of Queen
Esther, Mordecai, and the faithful Jews of that era. In the book of Zechariah, the prophet receives a vision,
and a word from the Lord, saying: “I saw by night, and behold a man riding upon a red horse, and he stood
among the MYRTLE TREES that were in the BOTTOM (ravine); and behind him were there red
horses, speckled, and white. Then said
I, O my Lord, what are these?...And the man that stood among the myrtle trees
answered and said, These are they whom the Lord has sent to walk to and fro
through the earth...Then the angel of the Lord answered and said, O Lord of
hosts, how long will You not have mercy on JERUSALEM and on the cities
of Judah?...And the Lord answered...Thus says the Lord of hosts; I am jealous
for JERUSALEM and for ZION with a great jealousy. And I am very sore displeased with the
heathen that are at east...Therefore...I am returned unto Jerusalem with
mercies; My house shall be built in it...The Lord shall yet comfort Zion, and
shall yet choose Jerusalem” (Zech. 1:7-17). Zechariah’s special calling
to the prophetic office was, along with Haggai, for the purpose of stirring up
the Jewish people to have faith and confidence in Yahweh, and to be courageous
in rebuilding the The myrtle trees in this prophetic vision were situated
in a bottom or ravine. This is almost
surely a reference to the “For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again
the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, I will also gather all nations, and will
bring down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for
My people and for My heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the
nations, and parted My land...Let the heathen be wakened, and come up (the
description of traveling to Jerusalem, no matter from what direction one is
coming) to the valley of Jehoshaphat: for there will I sit to judge all the
heathen round about. Put you in the
sickle, for the harvest is ripe; come, get you down; for the press is full, the
fats overflow; for their wickedness is great.
Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision: for the day of the
Lord is near in the valley of decision” (Joel 3:1-2, 12-15). Zechariah’s prophecy indeed has end-time implications, as
do the myrtle trees. They picture the
returning Messiah triumphing over the enemies of “And another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also
having a sharp sickle. And another angel
came out from the altar, which had power over fire; and cried with a loud voice
to him that had the sharp sickle, saying, Thrust in you sharp sickle, and
gather the clusters of the vine of the earth; for her grapes are fully
ripe. And the angel thrust in his sickle
into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great WINEPRESS
of the wrath of God. And the winepress
was trodden OUTSIDE THE CITY, and BLOOD came out of the
winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six
hundred furlongs” (Rev. 14:17-20). |
Note the key underlined words in the passage above, and
how they correspond perfectly to the description in the book of Joel, chapter
3. The winepress is in a specific location. Where is that place? OUTSIDE
THE CITY. The city is In this respect, Esther’s Hebrew name, Hadassah, is rife with much significance,
seeing that the entire episode with she, Mordecai, and Haman, pictures in type
this very latter-day occurrence, which will culminate in the marriage of the Lamb and the onset of
the Messianic Kingdom! In addition, with regard to the manner in which she is so
carefully prepared and groomed by Mordecai to be introduced to the king, we
cannot help but see in Esther a picture of the Bride of Messiah, for it is said
of her in Revelation 19: “Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honor to Him: for the marriage of
the Lamb is come, and His wife has MADE HERSELF READY” (Rev. 19:7). This passage reminds us of a
similar one written by the apostle Paul in his letter to the Ephesians, where
he states: “Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church (Gk. Ekklesia), and gave Himself for it; that
He might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the Word, that He
might present it to Himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or
any such thing: but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives...This is a
great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church” (Eph. 5:25-28,
32). And perhaps all such
description of the Bride of Messiah goes back to the graphic description of “Now when I passed by you, and looked upon you, behold, your time was
the time of love; and I spread My skirt over you, and covered your nakedness:
yea, I swore unto you, and entered into a (marriage) covenant with you, says
the Lord God, and YOU BECAME MINE” (Ezek. 16:8). Furthermore, we have the striking portion of the story
when Esther goes before the king to make known the petition on behalf of her
people. Under existing Persian law, no
one could approach the emperor, including even his own wife, unless that person
were specifically bidden by the king–to do otherwise was to invite death–unless
the king personally extended his scepter to the individual approaching
him. In that case, he would be extending
GRACE to the person involved,
which is precisely what occurred, for we read: “Now it came to pass on the third day, that Esther put on her royal
apparel, and stood in the inner court of the king’s house, over against the
king’s house: and the king sat upon his royal throne in the royal house, over
against the gate of the house. And it
was so, when the saw Esther the queen standing in the court, that she obtained FAVOR
in his sight: and the king held out to Esther the golden SCEPTER that
was in his hand. So Esther drew near,
and touched the top of the scepter” (Esth. 5:1-2). Esther, therefore, came under the favor or grace of the king, even as the Bride of
Christ is granted divine favor. We too
are now given permission by the king to appear before His throne, for it is
said of us: “For we have not a great High Priest who cannot be touched with the
feeling of our infirmities; but was in all point tempted like as we are, yet
without sin. Let us therefore come
boldly unto the THRONE of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find GRACE
to help in time of need” (Heb. 4:15-16). The scepter is
a Biblical type of Yahshua/Jesus as the ultimate ruler of the world. Remember that we read in Balaam’s prophecy
that “there shall come a Star out of
Jacob, and a SCEPTER shall rise out of Esther’s careful and courteous approach to Xerxes
typifies perfectly how the Bride of Christ should come before the king. In response, the great ruler not only extends
the scepter to her, but spontaneously promises to give her anything she desires,
even to half the kingdom (Esth. 5:3)!
Remember that we are told in Romans 8: “The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit, that we are the
children of God: and if children, then HEIRS of God, and joint-heirs
with Christ; if so be that we suffer with Him, that we may be also glorified
together” (Rom. 8:17). Indeed, even as Esther was
received by the king and grace was extended, so are we saved by grace, which is
the gift of God. And in like manner,
just as Esther was offered up to half the kingdom by the emperor, we who
believe are granted to be co-heirs with Yahshua/Jesus of far more, for we are
told by Paul: |
“What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us? He that spared not His own Son, but delivered
Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also FREELY GIVE US ALL THINGS”
(Rom. 8:31-32). Did you catch that
incredible promise? God the Father first
gives His very best in the person of Christ, who then becomes our guarantee
that we shall freely receive, not just a blessing, not just some things, but ALL THINGS! What a remarkable statement, and how
beautiful the manner in which the Almighty has done these things. He secures our reception of all things by
first giving us His Son. In other words,
He is saying to us, “Since I have
already given you My best, be assured you will therefore receive the rest!” And if you have ever wondered just what it is
that you will inherit, take a long look up at the vast, incomprehensible
universe spread out like a great celestial curtain, of which we are the merest
speck! And let the critical
circumstances facing Esther, Mordecai, and the Jews not be lost on us
today. They were in big trouble! Their very fate hung in the balance. The situation was crucial, deadly serious,
and very difficult, and yet the very best possible resolution was affected by
Yahweh on their behalf. Does this not
point up to us the profound truth of yet another passage from Romans 8 which
says: “And we know that ALL THINGS work together for good to them that
love God, to them who are called according to His purpose” (Rom. 8:28). When the Bible states that ALL THINGS work together for
good to them that love God, it means precisely what it says. All things means all things–the good, the
bad, and the ugly!! In the case of
Esther and the Jews, the conditions were bad, and in the case of Haman the
Agagite, circumstances were ugly indeed; but the pure truth of this Scripture
is clearly proven out. What about
us? The worse things get for you and me,
as long as we love God, meaning that we are devoted to Him and His ways, and
are called according to His purpose, the more certain we can be that things
will work out for good. Why? Because the almighty Yahweh is on our side,
and “Greater is He that is in you than
he that is in the world!” AMEN! Does
not the Word of the Almighty state: “Who shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifies. Who is he that condemns (as does Satan, and
as did Haman!)? It is Christ that died,
yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also
makes intercession for us. Who shall
separate us from the love of Christ?
Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness,
or peril, or sword?...No, in all these things we are MORE THAN CONQUERORS
through Him that loved us. For I am
persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor
powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any
other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in
Christ Jesus (Messiah Yahshua) our Lord” (Rom. 8:33-39). Let us, therefore, believe
and say that, like Mordecai, Esther, and the faithful Jews in “If God be for us, who can be against us?” (Rom. 8:31). There are certainly many other aspects of the book of
Esther that have significant spiritual overtones and meaning to them. This story is one that deserves a far more
careful reading than is typically customary, and that is something I would urge
each of us to do. There is, however, a
final point I would like to make before moving on in our own discussion. In the concluding portion of Esther, after Haman has been
hanged, we read about his sons (Esth. 5:11).
Remember that Haman is an Agagite, a descendant of the greatest of the
Amalekite kings, and thus has Esau the Edomite as his ancient ancestor. What then is the importance of his sons? Just this.
First of all, there were precisely ten in number (Esth. 9:10), and ten
has great significance with regard to the end-time and the evil beast power that is predicted to rise in
that era, for there are exactly TEN
KINGS OR KINGDOMS directly associated with this great anti-Christ war
machine (Rev. 17:12).. Secondly, they were all Edomites, and this may very well
also have end-time implications, for the seed of Esau is still alive and well
in this world today! Just as the ten
sons were under the authority of their father, so the ten kings or kingdoms in
the latter-days will give their power over to the beast, according to Revelation
13:12-13. This combination is going to
literally war against the returning Messiah and His army of angels and
resurrected saints. Will the beast power
in some way be connected to The struggle between Jacob and Esau is decidedly NOT OVER YET! The end-time scenario of the Bible reveals
that only at this great culmination of Satan’s desperate attempt to thwart
forever the plan of God will this great contest be resolved, and I can
guarantee that it will not be in favor of Esau and the Edomites. Will they be fighting against “Keep not You silent, O God: hold not Your peace, and be not still, O
God. For, lo, Your enemies make a
tumult: and they that hate You have lifted up the HEAD. They have taken CRAFTY COUNSEL (that’s
CONSPIRACY, whether anyone likes it or agrees with it!), and consulted
against Your hidden ones. They have
said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Take note that the first of
the enemy nations listed is EDOM,
and the second is ISHMAEL–the
two rejected sons of the Abrahamic line, the two peoples who have withstood the
purposes of Yahweh and His Son since their origins upon the earth–merged
together as the end-time leaders of the opposition against Israel and against
the Almighty, as they have been since the days of their notorious, rejected
ancestors! The blessing given to Ishmael
and Esau were not enough. They want what
they missed out on! They want precisely
what |
Finally, of course, the ten sons of Haman, along with many
other of their henchmen, were slain by the Jews under the leadership of
Mordecai, who was promoted to high rank within the empire. It was a glorious victory, a strong type of
the coming triumph of the Messiah over the enemies of When the ancient Amalekites were pushing west toward a
decimated In like manner, nearly a thousand years later, the
descendant of Amalek, Haman the Agagite, sought to destroy the people of And finally, at the end of this age, when once again the
corrupt, perverse, deceitful Edomite-led beast power will seek to pull off its
most diabolical scheme against the Israel of God, they will be utterly routed
by Yahshua/Jesus and His heavenly army.
When that great day arrives, then will be fulfilled the words of the
Scripture, which say: “But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the
house of the Lord shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it
shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it. And many nations shall come, and say, Come,
and let us go up the mountain of the Lord, and to house of the God of Jacob;
and He will teach us of His ways, and we will walk in His paths: for the LAW
(Heb. Torah) shall go forth from
Zion, and the WORD of the Lord from Jerusalem. And He shall judge among many people, and
rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into
plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a
sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore...For all the people
will walk every one in the name of his God, and we will walk in the name of the
Lord (YHWH) our God forever and
ever!” (Micah 4:1-5). What an incredible time this will be. This time, however, will be different than
when The book of Esther concludes with king Xerxes I speaking
and acting in favor of Mordecai. In the
final chapter, we read: “And the king Ahasuerus laid a tribute upon the land, and upon the
isles of the sea. And all the acts of
his power and of his might, and the declaration of the greatness of Mordecai,
whereunto the king advanced him (Heb. made
him great), are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings
of Media and Here we see king Xerxes as a
type of God the Father, and Mordecai as representative of the Messiah. Imagine that the great exploits of Mordecai
were actually recorded in the chronicles of the kings of Media and “Wherefore God also has highly exalted Him, and given Him a name which
is above every name: that at the name of Jesus (Yahshua) every knee should bow,
of things in heaven, and things in the earth, and things under the earth; and
that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ (Yahshua Messiah) is Lord,
to the glory of God the Father” (Phil. 2:9-11). EDOM & PALESTINE The name In addition, Esau himself was a very physically-oriented
man. He loved the hunt, and was skilled
with the bow and the sword. He became an
excellent horseman, and his Edomite descendants were known for their superb use
of the horse in battle. He was a man of
great fleshly appetites. The fact that
he valued a mere bowl of pottage when he was overcome with hunger, above his
own birthright privileges, is quite
telling in this regard. The Edomite empire developed much more quickly than did Esau’s descendants, like Jacob’s, were divided into
numerous families or clans. Unlike of the Rephaim giants,
became their local capital. The Edomites, of course, remained the enemies of During the Persian era of their exile, which we
previously discussed concerning Esther and Mordecai, the Jewish people fared
well. The After the death of Alexander in 323 B.C., the Greek
empire was ultimately divided among four of his leading generals, namely,
Seleucus Nicator, Cassander, Ptolemy
Soter, and Laomaedon, with two principle players emerging, Seleucus Nicator and
Ptolemy Soter, rulers of the Babylonian/Syrian and Egyptian divisions of the
kingdom respectively. For many years war
raged between the Seleucid and Ptolemaic empires, with Under the Seleucids, a vigorous program of Hellenization
was undertaken, increasing in intensity as time passed. Of course, the Jews had by this time rebuilt
the temple, along with the city of |
Things changed for the worse after 175 B.C. Prior to that time, The horrific treatment of the Jews at the hands of this
Seleucid madman led to an uprising known as the Maccabean Revolt, named after
Judas Maccabee, the leader, along with his brothers, of the rebellion. On 25 Chislev, 164 B.C., the Maccabean forces
defeated Lysias, marched into Unfortunately, the successors to the Maccabee brothers
became corrupt. John Hyrcanus I took the
reins of power in 135 B.C. He quickly
turned his anger toward the Edomites, whom he conquered in battle. He then, however made a critical mistake by
forcing them to convert to Judaism. In
this one act an evil seed was sown, one that would soon change the course of
Jewish history, and, to a great extent, that of the entire world! Within the next several generations, there
was a great intermingling of the Jews and Idumeans. Indeed, it was often difficult to discern
between the two races. Herein lay the
groundwork for the unthinkable–the coming of Edomite rule in the provinces of Although the history of the Hellenistic period is
interesting and varied, suffice it to say that, for purposes of our discussion,
Antipater II, the leader of the Idumeans, began to insinuate himself into
Jewish affairs during the troubled reign of Hyrcanus II (69-40 B.C.). He had befriended Julius Caesar by fighting
on his side in the victorious campaign in The installation of the Herodian monarchy in What could possibly have brought about such a defense of
Herod on the part of the high priest and Jewish ruler Hyrcanus II? The answer lies in the cunning nature of the
Idumean Herod. Even though he was
already married with children, for purely political purposes he became
betrothed to Mariamne, whose mother was Hyrcanus II’s daughter, and whose
father was Aristobulus II’s other son, Alexander, and thus a niece to
Antigonus, the rival of Herod. This move
served to strengthen his political base in John Hyrcanus II succeeded to the priesthood in 78 B.C.,
and to the throne in 69 B.C. He was,
however, very dependent upon By the first century A. D. and the advent of
Yahshua/Jesus on the scene, many of the Judeans or occupants of
Palestine/Judea, were actually of Edomite extraction. Indeed, much of the trouble the Jews
experienced during this turbulent era, was directly due to Edomite influence in
With the coming of Herodian rule in In addition, there were the Herodian kings, who were
essentially appointed by The third level of governmental control was the
Sanhedrin, which met regularly to debate local issues and make decisions with
regard to the day-to-day affairs of the Jewish people. They made and enforced the halakah or Jewish civil law. Although they hated their Roman oppressors,
their links to the Herods, however, cannot be denied, nor can the corrupting
influence of that illicit relationship upon the Jews be summarily
dismissed. The decision to force Judaism
upon the Idumeans years earlier was one of the great mistakes ever committed by
any race of people, for it tainted the
entire society. Many people are not aware that the Herods, of which there
were a number, were not Jews by race, but Edomites, descendants of Esau, the
enemy of Under Herodian rule, the Jewish power factions were
further corrupted. The Sadducees had
previously sided with Hyrcanus II, who began to appoint them to the high
priesthood, not according to the Torah teaching, but rather for political
purposes. This policy continued under
Herod the Great, but the price of being high priest escalated considerably,
thus commencing the practice of selling the position to the highest
bidder. The Sadducees, though always a
small and usually ineffective party, were able to draw heavily upon the more
affluent members of Jewish society, and thus had the means to purchase for
themselves a certain measure of power via the high priest’s office. The Sadducees, therefore, developed a much
closer working relationship with the Herodian overlords than did the ruling
Jewish party, the Pharisees. This group, originally of a purer pedigree than the
Sadducees, suffered under the Herods as well, their purity becoming more and
more tainted. Perceived as having
derived their position among the people from the time and spirit of Ezra, and
later, as champions of the Maccabean reforms, they enjoyed great support among
the common people, and thus were generally able to maintain authority in the
Sanhedrin, in spite of the frequent presence of a Sadducean high priest. The earlier establishment of the synagogue
system, an almost solely Pharisaic institution, also contributed to the power
base of the Pharisees, for they became a strong religious and social link for
the average Jew of that day. Corruption abounded during the first century, the time of
Yahshua/Jesus. The Messiah clearly
recognized the authority of the Pharisees, stating in Matthew 23: “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: all therefore
whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not you after
their works: for they say, and do not” (Matt. 23:2). |
They, however, just as clearly came under greater
condemnation than did their rival factions.
The reason for this is not that they were worse than the Sadducees, for
indeed they were not, but that they were by far the most dominant party, and
thus attracted much more of Yeshua’s attention and criticism. You will note that in the entire New
Testament there is only one occasion where the Sadducees are even addressed as
an entity on their own, and that instance is recorded in Matthew 22 (companion
references in Mark 12 and Luke 20), and indeed even it is most uncomplimentary. The fact is that under Edomite rule, intermarriage, and
influence, much damage was done in ancient “Woe unto you, scribes, and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut up the kingdom of heaven against
men: for you neither go in yourselves, neither suffer you them that are
entering to go in...for you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long
prayer: therefore you shall receive the greater damnation...for you compass sea
and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, you make him twofold more
the child of hell than yourselves. Woe
unto you, you blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it
is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a
debtor! You fools and blind: for whether
is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifies the gold? And, whosoever shall swear by the altar, it
is nothing; but whosoever swears by the gift that is upon it, he is
guilty. You fools and blind: for whether
is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifies the gift...for you pay tithe
of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the
law, judgment, mercy, and faith...Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! Because you build the tombs
of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchers of the righteous, and say, If we
had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them
in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore
you be witnesses unto yourselves, that you are the children of them that which
killed the prophets. Fill you up then
the measure of your fathers. You
serpents, you generations of vipers, how can you escape the damnation of
hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you
prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them you shall kill and
crucify; and some of them shall you scourge in your synagogues, and persecute
them from city to city: that upon you may come all the righteous blood shed
upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah
son of Berechiah, whom you slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall
come upon this generation” (Matt. 23). These words and others
spoken by the Messiah stand as some of the most condemnatory and imprecatory
ever issued against any people in the history of the world! On anther occasion, Yahshua/Jesus encountered
these same individuals, who indignantly ask of Him: “Why do Your disciples transgress the TRADITION OF THE ELDERS? For they wash not their hands when they eat
bread. But He answered and said unto
them, Why do you transgress the commandment of God by YOUR TRADITION?...You
hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, This people draws near
unto Me with their mouth, and honors Me with their lips; but their heart is far
from Me. But in vain do they worship Me,
TEACHING FOR DOCTRINE THE COMMANDMENTS OF MEN” (Matt. 15:2-3, 7-9). When Yahweh gave His Law to The deterioration of the Jewish political and religious
leadership had been set in motion centuries earlier. Bad spiritual seed planted in the Jewish
experience in And then, of course, the final straw–the advent of those
evil sons of Esau–the Herods. The
Edomite Herodian dynasty was one of the most despicable and adulterating
influences upon the Jewish people in their entire history. During this critical period, many
distinctions between Edomites and Jews were blurred. Numerous Edomites intermarried into the
Jewish society. Many others were either
assumed to be Jews, or, in fact, passed themselves off as Jews to achieve
political, monetary, or religious advantage.
It was, in fact, most probably from this very time span that the basis
for the statements of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 developed, which say respectively: “I know your works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but you are rich)
and I know the BLASPHEMY of them which SAY THEY ARE JEWS, AND ARE NOT,
but are of the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN” (Rev. 2:9). “Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which SAY THEY
ARE JEWS, AND ARE NOT, but DO LIE; behold, I will make them to come
and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you (Rev. 3:9” These passages may have
other applications as well, but in the physical realm, the Idumeans who merged
themselves with the Jews under the Herods, undoubtedly set things in motion for
Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 to even be comprehensible to later generations of
believers. It was during this period of
time when certain descendants of Esau began to claim that they were Jews, a
deception that has continued to be foisted off on an unsuspecting world ever
since, and one that has had, and continues to have, an overwhelmingly negative
effect upon, and dire implications for, the entire human race! By the first century A.D., the Jewish religion was no
longer pure, as it had been during the great revival in the days of Ezra and
the early returnees from As stated earlier, the Messiah was definitely in conflict
with the scribes and Pharisees. These
were the religious leaders who were in charge and exerted by far the most
influence upon the nation. Although this
may be controversial among some who read this article, it would certainly
appear that one of the major reasons for the continual dispute between
Yahshua/Jesus and at least some, if not
all, of the Pharisees had to do with their insistence upon merging the Hebrew
Scriptures with the so-called traditions
of the elders. In fact, many of
these various traditions eventually
became a part, indeed a major part, of the Talmud, which itself then became the
foundation and highest authority of Judaism. Most people should be quite aware that the Judaism of
today, and indeed as it has developed over the last nearly 2,000 years, is
emphatically not the religion of the Hebrew Scriptures. Many would be astonished to learn that the Talmud, along with its valuable
information, also contains numerous statements and teachings that are utterly
contrary to the Word of God, in fact, the diametric opposite of what the
Almighty commands. The Jews err greatly
in verbally honoring the Torah, but insist on viewing it through the lens of
the Talmud. When the opinions of Jewish rabbis are held
in equal or higher esteem than the Scriptures themselves, something is terribly
wrong with such a religion. This is
decidedly not anti-Jewish sentiment at all, since the Jewish scholars
themselves both know and admit that this contention is absolutely true. For instance, note the following quotation
from Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser: “Judaism is NOT the religion of the Bible” (Judaism and the Christian Predicament, p. 159). Writing in his book, A
History of the Jews, Solomon Grayzel states: “The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish
religion. Whatever laws, customs, or
ceremonies we observe–whether we are orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or merely
spasmodic sentimentalists–WE FOLLOW THE TALMUD. It is our common law” (p. 41). Please note also the
following quotation from the late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, former Chief Rabbi of
the “The return from The Edomite/Babylonian influence during and after the
Jewish exile contributed greatly to the formulation and adoption of rabbinic
Judaism. The rabbinical view of history
is that the Jews were chosen by God,
as a biological race and because of their genetic superiority, to bring about
an earthly Jewish kingdom in which Gentiles adhere to the so-called Noahide laws, but are subject to
rabbinic authority. The fact is,
however, that such a teaching is not to be found in the
pages of the Bible. |
Furthermore, while it is certainly correct that some of
the Jewish religious figures, especially of the Pharisees, did accept Yahshua/Jesus
as the Messiah, for the most part, as you well know, the ecclesiastical and
political leaders of the nation openly and knowingly rejected Him. The Talmud
contains some of the most despicable, blasphemous, and damnable statements of
any document in human history. In many
parts, it is far worse than the writings of almost any other religion on the
face of the earth, the Messiah Himself being thoroughly trashed in its pages as
a blasphemous heretic and sorcerer. The
average believer today could hardly bear to read many portions of these Jewish writings. There is no doubt that the scribes and Pharisees clearly
recognized the Law of Moses. In many
respects, they technically adhered to much of the instruction given by God, and
most of them were reasonably capable teachers of the Law. Remember that it was the Messiah Himself who
told the people: “The scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: ALL therefore WHATSOEVER
THEY BID YOU OBSERVE AND DO, THAT IS WHAT YOU SHOULD OBSERVE AND DO; but do
not you after their works: for they say, and do not” (Matt. 23:2-3). Now I realize that there are
any number of teachers in the Sabbath-keeping community today who try their
hardest to explain away this rather clear and forthright statement, but it is
to no avail. Yahshua/Jesus incontestably
recognized the authority of the scribes and Pharisees with respect to the Law
of Moses, and insisted that the people of His day understand this fact, and
that in all whatsoever they instructed the Jews to observe and do, in
that they should be obedient. There is
really no good reason to argue or debate Christ’s plain statement in this
regard. Some who have been raised on the
notion that the Sadducees were the ones in charge, or that they were held in
higher esteem, or that they possessed more legal or moral authority, are
unequivocally in error. Those who are so
disposed have almost always come into this understanding through dogmatic
organizational church teaching wherein
the particular leadership sides with the Sadducees in regard to either the
timing of Passover observance or possibly the reckoning of Pentecost. Differences between the Pharisees and
Sadducees on these two points, however, should not be permitted to cloud the
issue of which group the Messiah recognized as being in authority. To do so is to practice a kind of revisionist
history of the first century A.D., something a number of Sabbath-observing
churches have done over the years. That being said, however, there were significant problems
with the scribes and Pharisees of that era, and a good deal of the
responsibility can be laid squarely at the door of Edomite influence in the
affairs of first-century “What I would now explain is this, that the Pharisees have delivered to
the people a great many observances by succession from their fathers, which are
not written in the laws of Moses” (Antiquities
of the Jews, Bk. 13:10:6, p. 355). That there was an oral law
and tradition among the ancient Israelites, there can hardly be any doubt
whatsoever. This fact, however, is not
the real issue, for the true oral law did not contradict, add to, or detract
from, the written Torah. The problem
arose when the Jews, particularly after their return from Babylon, began to add
to the so-called oral law or at least the traditions
of the elders, to the point that by the first century A.D., the various
opinions, interpretations, practices, approaches, and commentary of the Jewish
scribes and rabbis often was deferred to more regularly than the Scriptures
themselves, and this practice only escalated during the next several hundred
years. We can easily see in the gospel
accounts some of these many traditions of the Jews becoming issues of
controversy between the Pharisees especially and the Messiah. Also, in any discussion of the first-century Jewish
religious/political parties, we must be acutely aware that among the Pharisees
there existed two very distinct sub-groups, namely, the schools of Hillel and Shammai, and that there were over 300 key points of difference
between them in their interpretation and teaching of the Torah. This is not an insignificant point, and, in
fact, can often be the determining factor with respect to the disagreement
Yahshua/Jesus had with the Pharisees.
The differences in these two great rabbis were rather sharp, Shammai
being known for the strictness of his views and possessor of a dour,
quick-tempered, and impatient personality.
In contrast, Hillel was more highly respected, and was known for his
gentleness, kindness, and concern for humanity.
Naturally, the disciples of two such eminent teachers would form two
very different and indeed often opposing schools of thought. Much, if not most, of the criticism directed
toward the Pharisees by the Messiah undoubtedly was the result of Shammai’s
teaching on the Torah and his attitude toward the people. Yahshua/Jesus Himself was a strict Torah-observant
person, meaning that He rigorously obeyed the written Law. He was also a Jew, and undoubtedly was
minutely aware of the oral law and the traditions of the elders. On the occasions when the traditions were not
in conflict with the written law, there would be no good reason for Him not to
have been in compliance. He, however,
was obviously not bound by all of the oral teachings, and, in fact, was
vigorously opposed to many of them. There is an unbelievable amount of anti-Semitism in this
world, although this is, of course, nothing new. It has been this way through centuries of
history. While no race of people is by
any means perfect, the Jews have suffered unbearably, not only for their own
sins, as have we all, but also because of the heinous sins of others–and very
specific and particular others at that!
One of the major causes of this anti-Jewish bias has everything whatever
to do with the very issue we are now discussing. Nothing, and I mean nothing, has cast more
aspersions on the true Jewish people than the wretched Edomites, intermingling
with and cloaking themselves outwardly as Jews, and who were anciently, and
indeed continue to be, an integral part of the world order that will bring the
realm of man’s rule upon this earth crashing to ruin at the hand of the
returning Messiah–may that great day be hastened! And the tragic part is that so few people in
this world are even remotely aware of this reprehensible group of people,
condemned by Almighty God from old time, still alive and well and seeking to
slay Jacob, as surely as did Esau over 3600 years ago! No wonder the Bible prophecies concerning Note the following quotations, every one of them from
traditional, established, and trustworthy Jewish sources: “In the days of John Hyrcanus...the Edomites became a section of the
Jewish people” (Encyclopedia Juaica,
vol. 6, p. 378). “They (the Edomites) were then incorporated with the Jewish nation” (The Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. V, p. 41). “From then on they (Edomites) constituted a part of the Jewish people,
Herod being one of their descendants” (The
New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 589. “They (the Edomites) were hereafter no other than Jews” (Flavius
Josephus, Antiquities
of the Jews, Book XIII, p. 279). “Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a Jew, or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew” (The Jewish Almanac, ed. Richard Siegel & Carl Rheins, p. 3). While this may seem like I am belaboring the point, the
fact is that what the Edomites did in this regard simply cannot be overstated,
since many of them have used the Jews, Judaism, and things Jewish, as a cover
or camouflage for their illegal and immoral acts against Israel and, when properly
understood, indeed all of humanity. If
this is not yet clear to you, bear with me and I assure you that it will become
so. In fact, with respect to the Edomite connection, notice
the following quotation from The Jewish
Encyclopedia: “Edom is in modern Jewry...Some anthropologists are inclined to
associate the racial origins of the Jews, not with Semites, whose language they
adopted, but with the Armenians and Hittites of Mesopotamia, whose broad skulls
and curved noses they appear to have inherited” (The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1905 ed., Vol. X, p. 284). This represents quite a remarkable statement coming, as
it does, from such a respectable reference work. The above citation is clearly based upon some
of the descendants of Esau/Hittites intermingling among the Jewish people, both
in terms of marriage, as well as socially and otherwise. Joseph Jacobs, writing in the same Jewish Encyclopedia under the article entitled Purity of Race, makes the following statement: |
Many students of Bible prophecy will be familiar with That a major line of Edomites migrated into the area now
known as As we have already seen with regard to the Amalekites,
the descendants of Esau were a strong, physical, warring kind of people, and a
people that often were on the move, not only in fighting or hunting, but also
in migrating to other areas. It would
appear that the Edomite connection to In the Temani king-list, one of the rulers was Husham (Hushan or Hushang of secular
history), a provable historical
character, whose descendant Alphidun
had two sons, one of whom was named Tur. Many scholars now believe that this is
probably the origin of the terms Turk,
Turkestan, and Alphidun’s second son was Ingre, whose son Manougher was
surnamed Phirouz, the Perses of Greek legend, and very
possibly the person after whom the Traditionally, the Turks have been a fierce people, very
much like the Edomites of old, expert archers and superb horsemen, skilled in
quickly killing their opponents, often brutal in their treatment of the enemy,
and able to achieve quick and decisive military victories. Remember that Isaac prophesied of Esau,
saying, “by your sword shall you live”
(Gen. 27:40). The fact that Edomite people are associated with the
Turks should not come as any great surprise, and the reason is that the area
now known as the nation of Turkey comprises a large part of an even greater
region known anciently as Anatolia, and from around 1900-1800 B.C. onward, the
greatest influence in Anatolia was of Hittite origin. Remember that Esau’s first two marriages were
to daughters of Heth, and that Heth, a son of The geographic area of from this point and
populated the whole of When Abraham fled The area that we know today as We must not forget that the apostle Paul was from In addition, it was during Roman times that the area of
modern There exists a very intriguing connection between Edom,
Babylon, and Rome, an association that was perpetuated and developed even
further at the time when the Roman empire rose to great power in the
world. Indeed, Rome has been related to
Babylon in the minds of many people since the time of Julius Caesar, or at least
since the era of Constantine, for it was under his authority that the
encroaching Babylonian mystery religion was adopted and given a Christian facade with the formation of
the Roman Catholic Church. In addition, the Jewish rabbinic scholars, both before
and after the time of Messiah, associated Earlier we read Psalms 137, which contains the lament of
the Jewish exiles in Babylonian captivity, and their petition to the Almighty
for revenge upon both “Remember, O Lord, the children of Now clearly we understand
that the initial level of interpreting this passage has to do with the first
destruction of Jerusalem by the actual nation of Babylon, and includes the
integral part played in that devastation by the Edomites, calling upon Yahweh
to avenge these enemies of His people.
We must also remember, however, that |
“See you not all these things?
Verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon
another, that shall not be thrown down” (Matt. 24:2). Note again how the Edomites
are characterized as speaking against And finally, notice to whom the Edomites are charged with
directing their evil words–“the DAUGHTER
OF BABYLON.” One has to wonder
if indeed the daughter of In both cases, This leads us to a pertinent question–Is it possible that
some of the Roman emperors were not actually Roman at all, but rather of
Edomite extraction–especially the emperor Constantine? This may not be able to be proved outright,
but it is a serious consideration. Some
of the Jewish rabbis indeed did think that this was true, and it remains an
intriguing, and indeed even a likely, possibility, as we will shall see. If all of these various connections are correct, and
there is every reason to believe that certainly most of them are, then Edom,
Babylon, Rome, and organized Christianity in the initial form of the Catholic
Church are all related, and, at times, synonymous. In order to solidify his political position, The Jewish scholar, Rabbi David Kimchi (1160-1235 A.D.),
makes an interesting statement in his commentary on the following passage of
Scripture in Joel 3:19: “Egypt shall be a desolation, and Edom shall be a desolate wilderness,
for their violence against the children of “The prophet mentions Egypt and Edom; Egypt on account of the TURKS,
and Edom on account of the ROMAN EMPIRE; and these two have now had the
dominion for a long time, and will continue until the redemption. This is the fourth beast in the vision of
Daniel. And this is said because the
majority is composed of EDOMITES.
For although many other nations are mixed among them, as is also the
case with the In like manner, Maimonides, the great Jewish commentator
of the 12 century, makes the following
statement concerning this subject: “The Edomites are idolaters, and Sunday, the first day of the week, is
the day of their festival, therefore it is forbidden to have commerce with them
in the The fact of the matter is
that the early emperors of the “The truth is, in various ways in their later writings.” According to The
Historians’ History of the World: “Diocletian permanently introduced eastern forms of government. Until his time the outward appearance of the
emperor had only a passing air of easternism, but with Diocletian this
character of government was established for all time to come. From Diocletian the white bandeau or diadem,
borrowed from the east, became the distinctive sign of the ruler, while
formerly the purple raiment had been the sole sign. Diocletian and his successor By the time “Now the major part of the ROMANS are EDOMITES, who profess [falsely] the law of Jesus. The Emperor Caesar CONSTANTINE was an EDOMITE,
and so were ALL the EMPERORS AFTER HIM. The destruction of the The spirit of
Esau is a lust for power and money,
even as the spirit of Ishmael is the
desire for pleasure. These two rejected sons from the Abrahamic
lineage, anciently joined together through marriage, have spread their evil
throughout the world. We see it coming
to great influence in the Hellenistic culture foisted off on the nations by
Alexander the Great. Beginning with |
The second The Byzantine civilization endured a little over a
thousand years, from 395 A.D. to about 1453 A.D. Its influence spread throughout Islam exploded out of Arabia and took control of the In 1040 a new threat appeared on the scene. The Arabs were displaced as leaders of the
Islamic world by the Seljuk Turks, a nomadic people from the Steppes of Central
Asia. This invasion led inexorably to
severe treatment of Christians by the war-like Turks, and pilgrims to the holy
land began arming themselves and traveling in large contingents, ostensibly for
protection, but now thought by some to have been nothing more than rehearsals
for what was about to transpire in Palestine. Skirmishes began to break out on the border between The fact is that the younger sons of European nobility,
under the western concept of primogeniture,
had no substantive hope of ever ruling their family lands. This led to great unrest as they sought to
somehow establish themselves. Their
unruly conduct, including the killing of one another, led to the Roman Church’s
desire to remove them from The European army set out from Over the next 200 years, successive Crusades were fought
with varying degrees of success and failure.
In the long run, they proved to be mistakes on the part of Christian
Europe. Of course, there were advantages
gained in the conduct of these wars, but it accrued to only certain powerful
interests. Untold thousands perished,
and for little or no good reason. This
entire ugly, tragic episode, however, is but yet another example of the clash
between Esau and Jacob that began thousands of years ago, and is, as we are
seeing, being consistently perpetuated through the ages of history. Constantinople finally fell to the Ottoman (O Teman - Obadiah 9) Turks in 1453,
transforming that great city into the capital of Islam and essentially ending
the Cornerstone Publications E-mail: jrec2002@cableone.net www.cornerstonepublication.com |